Former FIFA President Sepp Blatter has publicly criticized FIFA’s recent decisions regarding World Cup hosting rights, expressing that England should have been granted the opportunity to host the tournament before Saudi Arabia. His remarks have reignited discussions about FIFA’s selection process and the growing influence of Middle Eastern nations in global football.
Blatter’s comments come amid controversy over FIFA’s handling of the bidding process for the 2030 and 2034 World Cups. England, which has not hosted the tournament since 1966, has repeatedly expressed interest in bringing the World Cup back to its shores. However, FIFA has instead awarded the 2030 edition to a combined bid from Spain, Portugal, and Morocco, with additional games in Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay. The 2034 tournament was awarded to Saudi Arabia in an uncontested bid, raising questions about the fairness and transparency of FIFA’s decision-making.
England’s Unfulfilled Hosting Aspirations
England has long sought to host the World Cup again. The country made unsuccessful bids for the 2006 and 2018 tournaments, losing out to Germany and Russia, respectively. The failed 2018 bid was particularly contentious, with allegations of corruption and vote-trading within FIFA’s executive committee casting doubt on the integrity of the selection process. Despite having world-class stadiums, a passionate football culture, and a well-established infrastructure, England has been repeatedly overlooked.
Blatter, who served as FIFA President from 1998 to 2015, lamented this trend, stating that England has made significant contributions to the sport and deserved recognition. “England has done a great job for football, and they should be rewarded. They have tried since 1966 to get the World Cup back, and it’s a shame they didn’t get it,” he said.
Saudi Arabia’s Uncontested Bid for 2034
Saudi Arabia’s successful bid for the 2034 World Cup has drawn criticism due to the lack of competition in the selection process. FIFA’s decision to grant hosting rights without an official vote has fueled speculation that the organization orchestrated the process to ensure the outcome favored Saudi Arabia. Blatter expressed his disappointment, suggesting that the decision was made in a way that prevented any potential opposition. “They should have had it before Saudi Arabia, but it was organized in a very clever way so nobody was in opposition,” he remarked.
Saudi Arabia’s rapid rise in global sports has been a topic of debate. The country has invested billions of dollars into football, Formula 1, boxing, and golf, leading some critics to accuse it of “sportswashing”—using sports to improve its international image while facing criticism over human rights issues. The Saudi government has signed major deals with European clubs, lured top footballers to its domestic league, and even secured Lionel Messi as a tourism ambassador. Hosting the World Cup is seen as the latest move in its broader strategy to position itself as a major player in world football.
Controversies Surrounding the 2030 World Cup
FIFA’s decision to split the 2030 World Cup across multiple continents has also been met with criticism. The tournament will primarily be hosted by Spain, Portugal, and Morocco, but will also include games in Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay to commemorate the World Cup’s 100th anniversary. This decision has sparked logistical concerns, particularly regarding the environmental impact of teams and fans traveling across different continents.
Blatter, who was at the center of FIFA’s decision-making for nearly two decades, questioned the reasoning behind such a fragmented tournament. “It doesn’t make sense to have a World Cup played in multiple continents. The travel, the logistics, and the environmental concerns make it a questionable decision,” he stated.
Critics have pointed out that FIFA’s increasing focus on expanding the tournament and making political compromises could diminish the integrity of the competition. The idea of playing games across such vast distances has raised concerns about player fatigue, uneven conditions, and disruptions to the fan experience.
The Growing Influence of Middle Eastern Nations in Football
The rise of Middle Eastern countries as major players in global football is undeniable. Qatar’s hosting of the 2022 World Cup set a precedent, with the nation investing heavily in infrastructure, stadiums, and promotional efforts to showcase itself on the world stage. Now, Saudi Arabia’s successful bid for 2034 suggests a continued shift in power within FIFA.
Saudi Arabia’s influence extends beyond simply hosting the World Cup. The country’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) has taken control of top European football clubs, such as Newcastle United, and has made major investments in the Saudi Pro League, attracting global superstars with lucrative contracts. This aggressive expansion strategy has sparked debates about whether such influence is good for the sport.
Blatter noted that while financial investments in football are important, they should not come at the cost of fairness and tradition. “Football should not be dictated by money alone. Hosting rights should be based on merit, legacy, and global football development, not just financial power,” he emphasized.
FIFA’s Expansion and Its Implications
FIFA’s decision to expand the World Cup to 48 teams starting in 2026 has also raised concerns. The expansion means more games, more travel, and potentially a dilution of quality. While FIFA argues that increasing the number of teams allows for greater inclusivity and global representation, critics fear it could lead to lower overall competition standards.
Blatter, who initially supported expansion plans, now questions whether it is the right move for the sport. “A 48-team World Cup sounds good on paper, but we have to consider the impact on players, scheduling, and the prestige of the tournament. Football thrives on competition, and we must ensure that the World Cup remains the pinnacle of the sport,” he said.
Calls for England to Renew Its Bid
Despite past disappointments, Blatter encouraged England to continue pursuing a World Cup bid. He suggested that the nation should “wake up and apply again,” emphasizing that their efforts should not be deterred by previous setbacks. With the next available slot for a host nation being 2038, England still has time to prepare a compelling bid that showcases its ability to stage a world-class tournament.
England’s Football Association (FA) has yet to announce any concrete plans to bid for 2038, but with public support and proper lobbying, it could position itself as a strong candidate. The question remains whether FIFA will take its claims of transparency and fairness seriously in future decisions.
FIFA’s Response and Future Considerations
As of now, FIFA has not officially responded to Blatter’s criticisms. The organization’s decision-making processes continue to be scrutinized, especially regarding transparency and fairness in awarding hosting rights. The controversies surrounding recent World Cup allocations highlight the need for a more open and equitable selection system that considers both sporting merits and broader societal implications.
Football fans and analysts alike will be watching closely as FIFA moves forward with its preparations for the upcoming tournaments. With ongoing debates over the ethics of sports investments, climate concerns, and competitive balance, FIFA faces increasing pressure to uphold the integrity of the World Cup and its selection process.
Conclusion
Sepp Blatter’s remarks have once again brought attention to FIFA’s World Cup hosting decisions, particularly the perceived oversight of England in favor of nations like Saudi Arabia. As global football evolves, discussions about the governance, transparency, and future direction of the sport’s most prestigious tournament are likely to intensify. Whether FIFA will address these concerns remains to be seen, but the debate over fair play in World Cup hosting is far from over.
Ramadan 2025: Anticipated Start Dates and Global Observances
