Former FIFA President Sepp Blatter Criticizes World Cup Hosting Decisions
In a recent interview, former FIFA President Sepp Blatter voiced his concerns about the World Cup hosting process, stating that England should have been given the opportunity to host the prestigious tournament before Saudi Arabia. The Gulf nation has been confirmed as the host for the 2034 edition of the tournament, sparking debates about FIFA’s selection process and the broader influence of money in football.
Blatter, who served as FIFA president from 1998 until his resignation in 2015 amid a corruption scandal, highlighted England’s deep-rooted football history and significant contributions to the sport. He lamented that the country has not hosted the World Cup since 1966 and described this as a “shame.” According to Blatter, England has long deserved another chance to stage the tournament, given its infrastructure, football culture, and passionate fan base.
England’s Long Wait for Hosting Rights
England, widely recognized as the birthplace of modern football, has been a key player in the sport for well over a century. The country boasts some of the world’s most historic clubs, legendary players, and passionate supporters. Despite this, England has hosted the World Cup only once—in 1966, when it famously won the tournament on home soil.
Blatter expressed disappointment over this long wait, suggesting that England was overlooked for political and financial reasons. He criticized FIFA’s handling of the 2034 World Cup bidding process, implying that it was structured in a way that left Saudi Arabia with no real competition. According to Blatter, a nation with England’s football legacy should have been given priority over a country with little World Cup history.
Controversy Surrounding Saudi Arabia’s Bid
The decision to award the 2034 World Cup to Saudi Arabia has faced strong criticism from football analysts, human rights organizations, and fans worldwide. One of the major concerns is the country’s extreme desert climate, which could present serious challenges for both players and spectators. Even with advancements in cooling technology, the scorching heat remains a significant issue.
Additionally, human rights groups have pointed out ongoing concerns about Saudi Arabia’s record on freedom of speech, labor conditions, and women’s rights. These concerns echo the controversy that surrounded the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, where reports of migrant worker abuses and restrictive social laws cast a shadow over the tournament.
Critics argue that FIFA’s decision to grant Saudi Arabia hosting rights lacked transparency and failed to address these pressing concerns. Many believe that the process was influenced by financial interests rather than the best interests of the game itself.
Middle Eastern Influence in Global Sports
Blatter also commented on the growing influence of Middle Eastern nations in the world of sports, particularly football and Formula 1. In recent years, Gulf countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates have poured billions of dollars into sports investments.
Saudi Arabia, for instance, has launched the Saudi Pro League, attracting world-class players such as Cristiano Ronaldo, Neymar, and Karim Benzema with massive contracts. The country has also hosted major sporting events, including boxing matches, Formula 1 races, and golf tournaments.
While some see this as a positive development that boosts the global appeal of these sports, others worry that it is part of a broader strategy known as “sportswashing”—where countries use high-profile sporting events to improve their international reputation while deflecting criticism of their domestic policies.
Expansion of the World Cup
Another major concern raised by Blatter is FIFA’s decision to expand the number of teams participating in the World Cup. The 2026 tournament, set to be co-hosted by the United States, Mexico, and Canada, will feature 48 teams instead of the traditional 32.
Blatter believes that this expansion could negatively impact the quality of the competition. He warned that with more teams, there is a higher likelihood of weaker sides making it to the tournament, potentially diluting the overall standard of play. While FIFA has justified the expansion as a way to make the tournament more inclusive, critics argue that it could lead to logistical issues and longer, less competitive matches.
Blatter, who oversaw several World Cup tournaments during his tenure, remarked that the expansion makes the competition “too big,” potentially taking away from the exclusivity and excitement that made the event so prestigious in the first place.
FIFA’s Decision-Making Process Under Scrutiny
FIFA has long been accused of lacking transparency in its decision-making, particularly when it comes to awarding World Cup hosting rights. The process leading up to the 2034 World Cup selection has been particularly controversial. Many believe that Saudi Arabia was always the predetermined choice, and FIFA did little to encourage other nations to submit bids.
The organization set an unusually short deadline for bids, making it difficult for other countries to enter the race. As a result, Saudi Arabia ended up as the only serious contender, effectively winning the hosting rights uncontested.
This has led to accusations that FIFA prioritized financial and political interests over fairness and competition. Some critics argue that this is another example of how the governing body operates with little accountability, despite repeated promises of reform following the corruption scandals of the past decade.
Calls for England to Renew Its Bid
Despite these setbacks, Blatter urged England to remain persistent in its efforts to host the World Cup again. He encouraged the country to “wake up and apply again,” believing that its history, infrastructure, and footballing culture make it a deserving candidate.
The next available slot to host the tournament will be in 2038, meaning England has plenty of time to prepare a strong bid. However, given FIFA’s recent trends and decision-making, it remains uncertain whether England would be given a fair chance in the selection process.
Many football fans and experts argue that FIFA should do more to recognize footballing powerhouses like England, which have contributed significantly to the game. Whether England pursues another bid remains to be seen, but Blatter’s comments have reignited discussions about the fairness and integrity of FIFA’s selection process.
Conclusion
Sepp Blatter’s recent remarks have put FIFA’s World Cup hosting decisions under fresh scrutiny. His critique underscores the need for a more transparent and equitable bidding process—one that acknowledges the contributions of traditional footballing nations like England rather than prioritizing financial and political factors.
As discussions about future World Cup hosts continue, FIFA faces mounting pressure to address concerns about fairness, transparency, and the influence of money in football. If the organization fails to implement meaningful reforms, it risks further damaging the integrity and global appeal of football’s most prestigious tournament.
Do follow gulf magazine on Instagram
for more information click here
