In response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s controversial proposal to “take over” the Gaza Strip, Saudi Arabia has swiftly presented an alternative plan aimed at both supporting Palestinian sovereignty and advancing its own regional interests. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) is spearheading this initiative, emphasizing the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital—a stance that aligns with longstanding Arab positions but also serves to bolster Saudi Arabia’s geopolitical standing.
President Trump’s plan involves relocating Gaza’s two million residents to neighboring countries such as Egypt and Jordan, followed by U.S.-led redevelopment of the territory into a prosperous region dubbed the “Riviera of the Middle East.” This proposal has been met with widespread condemnation from Arab nations, who view it as a threat to Palestinian self-determination and regional stability.
Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Ministry issued a firm statement rejecting the plan, underscoring that normalization of relations with Israel is contingent upon the creation of a Palestinian state. The ministry declared this position “non-negotiable and not subject to compromises,” reflecting the kingdom’s commitment to Palestinian rights. The Saudi stance not only reiterates the Arab Peace Initiative of 2002 but also highlights Riyadh’s intent to maintain its influence in the region by standing firmly with the Palestinian cause.
Saudi Arabia’s Alternative Vision
In contrast to Trump’s approach, MBS is advocating for a solution that maintains Gaza’s Palestinian population within their homeland and focuses on reconstruction efforts. This strategy aims to prevent the forced displacement that could destabilize neighboring countries and incite regional unrest. By promoting a plan that aligns with Arab consensus and international law, Saudi Arabia seeks to position itself as a leading advocate for Palestinian rights while also enhancing its influence in Middle Eastern geopolitics.
MBS’s plan includes significant investments in infrastructure and economic development in Gaza, aiming to improve living standards while preserving the demographic and political identity of the Palestinian people. The proposed projects range from rebuilding hospitals and schools to enhancing energy and water resources. The goal is to create a self-sufficient Gaza that can thrive without external intervention or control.
Additionally, Saudi Arabia is exploring diplomatic channels to garner support for its plan. The kingdom has reached out to the European Union, Russia, and China, emphasizing the need for a multilateral approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This strategy not only challenges U.S. dominance in the region but also highlights Riyadh’s aspiration to play a more prominent role in international diplomacy.
Economic and Political Considerations
Saudi Arabia’s initiative is not solely altruistic; it is also driven by strategic interests. The kingdom aims to strengthen its regional leadership role and counter Iran’s influence by presenting itself as a stabilizing force in the Middle East. By opposing Trump’s plan, which has been criticized for its insensitivity and potential to exacerbate tensions, Saudi Arabia seeks to align itself with broader international sentiment favoring a just and lasting peace in the region.
The economic aspect of Saudi Arabia’s plan is closely tied to its Vision 2030 agenda, which seeks to diversify the kingdom’s economy away from oil dependence. A stable Gaza, integrated into a broader regional economic framework, could open new markets for Saudi businesses and contribute to the kingdom’s long-term economic goals. Additionally, by funding reconstruction projects in Gaza, Saudi Arabia could enhance its soft power and portray itself as a benevolent leader in the Arab world.
Riyadh is also cautious about Iran’s expanding influence in Gaza through its support of Hamas and other militant groups. A successful Saudi-led initiative in Gaza could diminish Tehran’s leverage, shifting the balance of power in the region. By presenting a plan that addresses humanitarian needs while curbing extremism, Saudi Arabia aims to undermine Iran’s narrative of resistance and attract broader Arab support.
Challenges Ahead
Despite its proactive stance, Saudi Arabia faces significant challenges in implementing its alternative plan. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s firm opposition to Palestinian statehood poses a major obstacle to any two-state solution. The Israeli government’s expansion of settlements in the West Bank further complicates efforts to negotiate a viable Palestinian state.
Furthermore, excluding Hamas from governance discussions in Gaza is likely to be met with resistance, as the group maintains substantial support and control within the territory. Engaging all Palestinian factions, including Hamas, is crucial for any plan’s success, as sidelining key stakeholders could lead to further instability. Saudi Arabia’s reluctance to directly negotiate with Hamas could limit the effectiveness of its initiative unless it finds a way to incorporate the group into broader peace efforts.
Another challenge is the U.S.-Saudi relationship. While Riyadh has shown willingness to diverge from Washington’s policies, it cannot afford to alienate its key security partner completely. Balancing its stance on Gaza with its broader strategic partnership with the U.S. will require careful diplomacy. MBS’s ability to navigate these complexities will determine the viability of Saudi Arabia’s alternative plan.
International Support and Humanitarian Efforts
Saudi Arabia has a history of supporting Palestinian causes through financial aid and diplomatic efforts. The Saudi Fund for Development (SFD) has contributed significantly to various projects benefiting Palestinians, including infrastructure and educational initiatives. This ongoing support underscores the kingdom’s commitment to alleviating humanitarian crises in Gaza and promoting sustainable development.
In addition to economic aid, Saudi Arabia has been actively involved in diplomatic efforts to revitalize the Arab Peace Initiative, which calls for normalized relations with Israel in exchange for a complete withdrawal from occupied territories and the establishment of a Palestinian state. By reiterating this framework, Riyadh seeks to build a coalition of Arab states that can collectively exert pressure on both Israel and the United States to adopt a more balanced approach.
Saudi Arabia is also leveraging its influence in international organizations such as the United Nations to push for resolutions condemning Israeli settlement activities and affirming Palestinian rights. This strategy aims to build global consensus around the need for a two-state solution and isolate Israeli hardliners who oppose Palestinian statehood.
Conclusion
Saudi Arabia’s alternative to President Trump’s Gaza plan reflects a strategic effort to balance support for Palestinian sovereignty with the kingdom’s regional ambitions. By advocating for an independent Palestinian state and opposing forced displacement, Saudi Arabia aims to enhance its leadership role in the Middle East. However, the success of this initiative depends on navigating complex political dynamics, including Israeli opposition and intra-Palestinian divisions.
MBS’s plan represents a bold attempt to reshape the regional order and challenge both Iranian influence and U.S. dominance in the Middle East. Yet, without broad international support and meaningful engagement with all Palestinian factions, the plan risks being dismissed as another unfeasible proposal in the long history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Engaging all relevant parties in inclusive dialogue will be essential to achieving a viable and lasting solution to the Gaza crisis.
By presenting a vision that emphasizes both Palestinian sovereignty and regional stability, Saudi Arabia is seeking to redefine its role as a power broker in the Middle East. Whether this vision can be realized remains uncertain, but it marks a significant shift in Riyadh’s approach to one of the region’s most intractable conflicts.
Inside Saudi’s Own Version of El Clásico: Crossing the Great Cultural Divide
