In a significant geopolitical development, prominent Saudi commentators and Arab leaders are advocating for a two-state solution in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s contentious proposal concerning the Gaza Strip. The plan suggests relocating Gaza’s population to neighboring countries, a move that has been met with widespread condemnation across the Arab world.
Trump’s Controversial Gaza Proposal
President Trump’s initiative involves the U.S. assuming control over the Gaza Strip and resettling its more than two million residents in Egypt and Jordan. This proposal aims to redevelop Gaza but has been criticized for potentially violating international laws and destabilizing the region. Experts warn that such a mass displacement could lead to significant demographic and political upheaval. The plan has been met with alarm from human rights organizations and political analysts who argue that forcing Gazans to relocate would amount to an unprecedented forced population transfer, setting a dangerous global precedent.
The Trump administration has positioned the proposal as a pragmatic solution to what it calls the “Gaza problem.” However, Arab nations have largely dismissed the plan as an attempt to sideline Palestinian national aspirations. The Palestinian Authority and Hamas have both rejected the initiative, labeling it a direct attack on Palestinian sovereignty and an effort to erase Gaza’s role in the broader Palestinian struggle.
Unified Arab Opposition
The proposal has galvanized Arab nations to present a united front. Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and other Gulf states have expressed strong opposition, emphasizing the necessity of a two-state solution that respects Palestinian sovereignty. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman convened a meeting in Riyadh with leaders from Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, and Bahrain to discuss an alternative plan that focuses on reconstruction without displacement.
Saudi officials have reiterated that any resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict must be based on the Arab Peace Initiative, first proposed in 2002. This initiative calls for a two-state solution, with an independent Palestinian state based on pre-1967 borders and East Jerusalem as its capital. The overwhelming consensus among Arab leaders is that the Trump administration’s approach does not consider Palestinian rights and, if implemented, could exacerbate tensions rather than resolve them.
Saudi Commentators Advocate for Palestinian Rights
Influential Saudi commentators have been vocal in their criticism of Trump’s plan. They argue that any solution must honor the rights and aspirations of the Palestinian people, including the establishment of an independent state. Many believe that the proposal reflects a broader trend in U.S. foreign policy that disregards Palestinian self-determination in favor of Israeli security concerns.
Saudi media outlets have highlighted the flaws in Trump’s plan, questioning the feasibility of relocating millions of people without severe humanitarian consequences. Analysts argue that the plan ignores the fundamental issues behind the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, such as settlement expansion, military occupation, and the blockade on Gaza.
Prominent figures in Saudi political circles have also stressed that any peace plan lacking Palestinian involvement is doomed to fail. “Palestinians cannot be treated as an obstacle to be removed,” one Saudi analyst remarked. “They are a people with legitimate national aspirations, and any real solution must address their demands.”
Alternative Arab-Led Reconstruction Plan
In response to the U.S. proposal, Egypt has spearheaded a comprehensive, three-phase reconstruction plan for Gaza. This initiative aims to rehabilitate the region without displacing its inhabitants and seeks financial support from Gulf nations, with an estimated budget of $53 billion. The plan also proposes sidelining Hamas in favor of reinstating the Palestinian Authority’s governance in Gaza, ensuring a more stable and internationally recognized administration.
Arab leaders are also exploring diplomatic efforts to revive negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian leadership. While skepticism remains high, some experts suggest that increased regional cooperation could create new opportunities for peace. The renewed push for Arab unity on the Palestinian issue reflects a broader regional effort to counterbalance American and Israeli influence in determining Gaza’s future.
International Repercussions and Concerns
The international community has expressed alarm over the potential consequences of Trump’s plan. There are fears that relocating Gazans could trigger a mass exodus toward Europe, exacerbating the ongoing migrant crisis. Reports suggest that many Palestinians, facing uncertain futures in Egypt or Jordan, might attempt to reach European shores, leading to significant political and social challenges for both transit and destination countries.
European leaders have voiced concerns that Trump’s approach could inflame tensions in the Middle East, potentially sparking new waves of unrest. The European Union has reaffirmed its commitment to a two-state solution and has warned that any unilateral action on Gaza could lead to diplomatic repercussions. Meanwhile, human rights organizations have called on the United Nations to intervene and ensure that any resolution to the Gaza crisis adheres to international law.
Additionally, some Middle Eastern analysts argue that Trump’s proposal could embolden extremist groups in the region. By undermining Palestinian sovereignty, the plan could fuel resentment and radicalization, leading to further instability. “This plan does not solve the problem—it only shifts the crisis elsewhere,” a Jordanian diplomat commented.
Upcoming Arab Summit in Cairo
To solidify their stance and present a cohesive alternative, Arab leaders are scheduled to convene an emergency summit in Cairo. The agenda includes finalizing the reconstruction plan for Gaza and reiterating their commitment to a two-state solution. This summit underscores the Arab world’s resolve to address the Palestinian issue independently and resist external proposals that undermine regional stability and Palestinian rights.
The summit is expected to produce a unified declaration rejecting Trump’s plan and reinforcing the need for a diplomatic solution. Analysts predict that the meeting will also discuss broader regional security concerns, particularly in relation to Iran’s influence in Palestinian affairs.
Conclusion
The unified opposition from Saudi commentators and Arab leaders against President Trump’s Gaza proposal highlights the complexities of Middle Eastern geopolitics. By advocating for a two-state solution and proposing an Arab-led reconstruction plan, these nations aim to uphold Palestinian sovereignty and regional stability. The forthcoming summit in Cairo will be a critical moment in determining the future of Gaza and the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
As tensions continue to mount, the Arab world faces the challenge of balancing diplomatic negotiations with firm resistance to external pressures. The global community will be watching closely as these discussions unfold, with hopes that a viable, just, and lasting solution to the Gaza crisis can be achieved.
Saudi Arabia Strengthens MICE Tourism as Discover Saudi Joins ICCA
