In a move that could shake international diplomacy, Sudan has taken the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), accusing the Gulf nation of violating the Genocide Convention by allegedly supporting the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in their violent campaign against the Masalit people in Darfur.
This case, filed on April 10, 2025, marks a rare and serious accusation between two United Nations member states and could have deep consequences for how the international community handles allegations of genocide and complicity in mass violence.
The Ongoing Conflict in Sudan
Sudan has been engulfed in a brutal civil war since April 2023, when fighting broke out between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary RSF. This violent power struggle has devastated the country, especially the Darfur region in western Sudan. Darfur has long been a troubled area, and recent violence echoes the horrors of the early 2000s when genocide was committed against non-Arab ethnic groups.
According to humanitarian agencies, more than 14 million people have been forced to flee their homes due to the ongoing conflict. Over 24,000 people have reportedly been killed. The RSF, in particular, has been accused of carrying out massacres, burning villages, and committing widespread sexual violence, especially against the Masalit ethnic group in West Darfur.
Many international observers, including rights groups and United Nations officials, have described these acts as war crimes and potential genocide.
Sudan’s Accusations Against the UAE
Sudan’s case at the ICJ alleges that the UAE played a direct role in enabling these atrocities by providing weapons, financial support, and logistical help to the RSF. According to Sudan, this makes the UAE complicit in genocide—a direct violation of the 1948 Genocide Convention, which both countries have signed.
The evidence reportedly includes intelligence and satellite images showing flights carrying arms from the UAE to Chad, where they were then transported across the border to RSF fighters. Sudan claims that these weapons were later used in mass killings in Darfur, particularly targeting the Masalit population.
In addition to arms shipments, Sudan argues that the UAE financially supported RSF leaders and businesses connected to them. Some of these entities have also been hit with U.S. sanctions in the past year for their alleged involvement in fueling the conflict.
Sudan is asking the ICJ to declare that the UAE’s actions breached international law, and to issue orders for the UAE to immediately stop supporting the RSF and to compensate Sudan for the damage caused.
UAE’s Response: A Political Stunt?
The UAE has strongly rejected the accusations, calling them “baseless and politically motivated.” UAE officials argue that their involvement in Sudan has always been focused on humanitarian support, and they deny any military backing of the RSF. They claim that any flights or goods sent to the region were intended for peaceful purposes, such as delivering aid and supplies to displaced people.
At the ICJ, the UAE also questioned the court’s authority to even hear the case. The Gulf country referred to a 2005 reservation it placed when signing the Genocide Convention, which they say prevents the ICJ from judging disputes related to the convention unless both parties agree. The UAE argues that Sudan’s filing is a misuse of international law and is more about political pressure than justice.
The Bigger Picture: Justice or Geopolitics?
Sudan’s bold move to file a case against a wealthy Gulf state like the UAE has triggered global interest. It also raises important questions: Is this case a genuine pursuit of justice for war victims, or is it part of a larger political strategy?
Some experts believe that Sudan’s current military government is trying to shift blame for the ongoing conflict and draw international attention away from its own internal problems. Others see this as a necessary step to hold powerful players accountable for their role in fueling conflict in Africa.
Regardless of motives, the case brings the question of third-party complicity in genocide to the global stage. If the ICJ accepts the case and rules in Sudan’s favor, it could set a legal precedent, making it easier in the future to hold countries responsible for indirectly supporting war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Legal and Diplomatic Hurdles
While the case is dramatic, legal experts say Sudan faces a difficult path ahead. Proving a state’s direct responsibility for genocide is extremely difficult. Sudan must show not only that atrocities occurred—which is well documented—but that the UAE knowingly supported the RSF with the intent to destroy a specific ethnic group, which is a key element of the legal definition of genocide.
Furthermore, the ICJ’s decision-making process is slow. Even if the court agrees to hear the case, it could take years before a final ruling is made. Any enforcement would also require backing from the United Nations Security Council, where countries like the UAE have influential allies, including permanent members who could veto decisions.
What’s Next?
The ICJ is expected to spend the coming weeks reviewing Sudan’s application and the UAE’s objections. In the meantime, humanitarian groups continue to call for immediate international action to protect civilians in Sudan and investigate war crimes on the ground.
The international community will be watching closely. If the court moves forward with the case, it could signal a new chapter in international accountability—one where not only those who commit genocide, but also those who support them, are held responsible.
Final Thoughts
This case is not just about legal arguments or diplomatic pressure—it is about the lives of millions of Sudanese people suffering from a conflict that the world cannot afford to ignore. Whether Sudan’s lawsuit is a political maneuver or a genuine call for justice, it has succeeded in one thing: bringing global attention back to Darfur, where the cries for help have been growing louder with each passing day.
Australian Travelers Receive Complimentary Meals at Hamad International Airport
